2012/12/13 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 13 December 2012 11:11, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:04:46AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> Anyway, this need to be thought of as future step, since this patch is >>> not changing anything to that sequence as Kevin also is pointing out. >> >> Given that Kevin is talking about stuff in sdhci as if it affects MMCI, >> and that neither of you have picked that up, you're *still* not gaining >> any confidence from me that you're actually thinking about the changes >> you're making. So I'm not really caring about how many acks your patches >> get, I'm still going to be reluctant to apply them without thinking about >> them for a bit. > > MMCI is doing "pm_runtime_get_sync" in it suspend. So the same > principles as Kevin is describing for sdhci goes for MMCI. Sorry if > this was not clearly pointed out. > sorry for my unclear words. I just use sdhci directly to explain this. It's similar for sdhci and mmci on this point. pm_runtime is temporarily disabled during suspend/resume. Thanks Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
