On 13 December 2012 11:11, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:04:46AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> Anyway, this need to be thought of as future step, since this patch is >> not changing anything to that sequence as Kevin also is pointing out. > > Given that Kevin is talking about stuff in sdhci as if it affects MMCI, > and that neither of you have picked that up, you're *still* not gaining > any confidence from me that you're actually thinking about the changes > you're making. So I'm not really caring about how many acks your patches > get, I'm still going to be reluctant to apply them without thinking about > them for a bit. MMCI is doing "pm_runtime_get_sync" in it suspend. So the same principles as Kevin is describing for sdhci goes for MMCI. Sorry if this was not clearly pointed out. Kind regards Ulf Hansson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
