On 28 November 2012 15:00, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 21 November 2012 16:22, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 16 October 2012 13:44, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 16 October 2012 10:17, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This code has not been tested on a "legacy" ARM PL180 but only for >>>>> ux500 boards. Even if it should affect DMA handling we should test >>>>> this properly. Would be great if you were able to help out, I guess >>>>> you still have available hardware for these tests? >>>> >>>> I can test the Integrator/CP and Realview in IRQ/PIO mode and >>>> the U300 in DMA mode. >>> >>> Great! >>> >>>> >>>> I need some help to provoke errorpath in DMA mode though, >>>> so any hints are welcome... >>> >>> One good option could be to stress test card insert/removal sequences, >>> while at the same time doing read/write requests. >>> >>>> >>>> Yours, >>>> Linus Walleij >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Ulf Hansson >> >> Just a kind reminder for Linus; did you manage to do some tests for >> these patches? >> >> Kind regards >> Ulf Hansson > > I have now tested these patches for ARM-RealView PB1176. Looks good! I > stress tested card insert/remove at the same time you write/read to > the card. Error handling is stable. > > Kind regards > Ulf Hansson For clarification. Skip this patch. The next version is rebased on top of 3.7 and is thus not based on "mmc: mmci: Support non-power-of-two block sizes for ux500v2 variant", which needs some rework. Kind regards Ulf Hansson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
