> > Interesting question is now why it worked on your older kernel? The code > > around BROKEN_TIMEOUT is there for much longer, I'd think. > > > not in fact it seems to have been broken from a long time and I think I know and you are saying the same, in fact :) Your patch came in around 2.6.37 and here it was said that 2.6.39 works fine. Might be random, though. > because unlike the i.MX35 it seems that the i.MX25 manages to read > properly the partition table even without the timeout quirk and it > seems that I didn't do more extensive tests for this patch. Please do next time. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
