Hi Wolfram, Le Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:01:49 +0200, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > >does that attached patch fix your problem ? > > > > YES, indeed it does to a certain degree. The timeout errors do not > > occur anymore and I can successfully perform many fs->ops, such as > > Interesting question is now why it worked on your older kernel? The code > around BROKEN_TIMEOUT is there for much longer, I'd think. > not in fact it seems to have been broken from a long time and I think I'm responsible of that in 37865fe91582582a6f6c00652f6a2b1ff71f8a78 "mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix timeout on i.MX's sdhc" because unlike the i.MX35 it seems that the i.MX25 manages to read properly the partition table even without the timeout quirk and it seems that I didn't do more extensive tests for this patch. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
