"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Friday, March 09, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > How about calling it "runtime latency"? Or "runtime wakeup latency" in >> > case people think there might be some other sort of latency associated >> > with runtime power management. >> >> Either is better than just latency, but I would vote for runtime wakeup >> latency. > > Well, that would be pm_qos_runtime_wakeup_latency_us. Kind of long, IMHO. Yeah, the long names are why I initially suggested having a 'qos' subdir. > Apart from this "wakeup" may be thought to refer to "remote wakeup", which > is when a device is resumed as a result of an external signal. > > pm_qos_resume_latency_us is shorter and since it is referred to in the > documentation as "resume latency", I don't see any problems with that name. OK Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
