On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> > The word "wakeup" may refer to many different things, as well as the word > >> > "resume". :-) > >> > >> Yes, but what's the confusion in this case? > >> > >> IMO, The existing /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup* meaning is the same > >> meaning as as for the wakeup latency in this patch, > > > > No, it is not. They refer to system wakeup. :-) > > OK, now I'm confused (again). I thought those could be used for runtime > PM wakeups also. At least I was planning on using them for any kind of > wakeup. > > >> so I don't understand where the confusion would be. > > > > See above. ;-) > > Sheesh, this is getting ugly. > > So wakeup* attributes refer to system resume and resume* attribues > refer to runtime PM. > > Yuck. How about calling it "runtime latency"? Or "runtime wakeup latency" in case people think there might be some other sort of latency associated with runtime power management. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
