On Friday, March 09, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > [...] > > > How about calling it "runtime latency"? Or "runtime wakeup latency" in > > case people think there might be some other sort of latency associated > > with runtime power management. > > Either is better than just latency, but I would vote for runtime wakeup > latency. Well, that would be pm_qos_runtime_wakeup_latency_us. Kind of long, IMHO. Apart from this "wakeup" may be thought to refer to "remote wakeup", which is when a device is resumed as a result of an external signal. pm_qos_resume_latency_us is shorter and since it is referred to in the documentation as "resume latency", I don't see any problems with that name. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
