On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 03 2011, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> Can this patch be accepted by criteria that its an additional >> feature supported by the hardware and hence good to have the support >> in the driver.Also note the patch has been tested. > > I think Will and James should make the call on that. > > My own opinion is that it's not usually a good idea to merge code that > increases complexity for no performance gain; if the feature is actually > important, someone should find a way to finish it and measure a > performance gain (the gain can be in any of bandwidth, memory, or > lower CPU utilization) with it, to prove that the change is worthwhile. I'm inclined to agree. I don't want to feel like I am blocking inclusion of anyone's hard work, but unless there is a clear advantage for one option over the other I can't see a good reason for merging it. At present it adds a question to the Kconfig that is pretty much impossible for the user to answer (do I turn this feature on or off? what is the advantage of choosing each option?). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
