On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:54:48AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 25 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hm, strange, now all patches should be correct - if the correct versions > > are taken. Let's do it easier: I've uploaded all 15 patches (14 mine and 1 > > from Simon) as a quilt series to > > > > http://download.open-technology.de/tmio-for-2.6.39/ > > Thanks, I just needed to pull changes from Linus into mmc-next. > > I've pushed everything out to mmc-next now. If anyone else is able to > grab mmc-next and supply a Tested-by: for their hardware, that'd be > appreciated. Hi, I have done some tests on a Renesas Mackerel board (Guennadi likely has one too) both with and without my "mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM" change - which needs to go through RMK's tree and is the motivation for the " mmc: tmio_mmc: Move some defines into a shared header" patch. I didn't notice any problems. FWIW Tested-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Also, if anyone thinks that some of this should wait until .40, now's a > good time to speak up. :) I have no particular objections though I do agree that it is a lot of churn at this stage of the release cycle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
