Hi Kyungmin, Ben, On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18:12AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet. > >> as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the > >> function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks. > >> > >> Choose any one from MMC maintainer. > > > > Both approaches are generally acceptable for MMC, so I would want to > > leave it up to the maintainer of the driver in question (which is Ben, > > in this case?) to choose between them. > > Hi Chris, > > Did you get the opinion from Ben? > > I hope this decision will be done before 2.6.37 merge windows start to > support SDHCI support on s5pc210. Hm, I didn't, and Ben's been silent about the urgent sdhci-s3c patches too. Ben, are you just dealing with a large backlog, or are you interested in nominating someone else to take over sdhci-s3c? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
