On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet. >> as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the >> function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks. >> >> Choose any one from MMC maintainer. > > Both approaches are generally acceptable for MMC, so I would want to > leave it up to the maintainer of the driver in question (which is Ben, > in this case?) to choose between them. Hi Chris, Did you get the opinion from Ben? I hope this decision will be done before 2.6.37 merge windows start to support SDHCI support on s5pc210. Thank you, Kyungmin Park > > That said, I think my own mild preference is for Jaehoon's approach. > > Thanks, > > - Chris. > -- > Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> > One Laptop Per Child > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
