On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:27:15AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 10/15/2015 11:09 AM, Hui Zhu wrote: >> >I got that add function interfaces is really not a good idea. >> >So I add a new struct migration to put all migration interfaces and add >> >this struct to struct page as union of "mapping". >> >> That's better, but not as flexible as the previously proposed >> approaches that Sergey pointed you at: >> >> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1507.0/03233.html >> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1508.1/00696.html >> >> There the operations are reachable via mapping, so we can support >> the special operations migration also when mapping is otherwise >> needed; your patch excludes mapping. >> > > Hello Hui, > > FYI, I take over the work from Gioh and have a plan to improve the work. > So, Could you wait a bit? Of course, if you have better idea, feel free > to post it. > > Thanks. Hi Minchan and Vlastimil, If you don't mind. I want to wait the patches and focus on page movable of zsmalloc part. What do you think about it? Best, Hui -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>