On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:27:15AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 10/15/2015 11:09 AM, Hui Zhu wrote: > >I got that add function interfaces is really not a good idea. > >So I add a new struct migration to put all migration interfaces and add > >this struct to struct page as union of "mapping". > > That's better, but not as flexible as the previously proposed > approaches that Sergey pointed you at: > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1507.0/03233.html > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1508.1/00696.html > > There the operations are reachable via mapping, so we can support > the special operations migration also when mapping is otherwise > needed; your patch excludes mapping. > Hello Hui, FYI, I take over the work from Gioh and have a plan to improve the work. So, Could you wait a bit? Of course, if you have better idea, feel free to post it. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>