On 09/22/2015 01:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > >> > So I defined all the kernel-internal types as u16 since I *know* the >> > size of the hardware. >> > >> > The user-exposed ones should probably be a bit more generic. I did just >> > realize that this is an int and my proposed syscall is a long. That I >> > definitely need to make consistent. >> > >> > Does anybody care whether it's an int or a long? > long is frowned upon due to 32/64bit. Even if that key stuff is only > available on 64bit for now .... Well, it can be used by 32-bit apps on 64-bit kernels. Ahh, that's why we don't see any longs in the siginfo. So does that mean 'int' is still our best bet in siginfo? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>