Re: [PATCH 10/26] x86, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
>  
> +static inline u16 vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	u16 pkey = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> +	unsigned long f = vma->vm_flags;
> +	pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_0)) << 0;
> +	pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_1)) << 1;
> +	pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_2)) << 2;
> +	pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_3)) << 3;

Eew. What's wrong with:

     pkey = (vma->vm_flags & VM_PKEY_MASK) >> VM_PKEY_SHIFT;

???

> +static u16 fetch_pkey(unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)

So here we get a u16 and assign it to si_pkey

> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE) && si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
> +		info.si_pkey = fetch_pkey(address, tsk);

which is int.

> +			int _pkey; /* FIXME: protection key value??

Inconsistent at least.

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]