Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code about huge_pmd_unshare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:26:18 +0000 "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Memory fails me.  Why do some architectures (arm, arm64, x86_64) want
> > huge_pmd_[un]share() while other architectures (ia64, tile, mips,
> > powerpc, metag, sh, s390) do not?
> 
> Potentially laziness/ignorance-of-feature?  It looks like this feature started on x86_64 and then spread
> to arm*.

Yes.  In 3212b535f200c85b5a6 Steve Capper (ARM person) hoisted the code
out of x86 into generic, then made arm use it.

We're not (I'm not) very good about letting arch people know about such
things.  I wonder how to fix that; does linux-arch work?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]