RE: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code about huge_pmd_unshare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Memory fails me.  Why do some architectures (arm, arm64, x86_64) want
> huge_pmd_[un]share() while other architectures (ia64, tile, mips,
> powerpc, metag, sh, s390) do not?

Potentially laziness/ignorance-of-feature?  It looks like this feature started on x86_64 and then spread
to arm*.

Huge pages are weird on ia64 in that they have to be in a specific range of virtual addresses (region 4).
But I don't see why that would prevent sharing pmd's.

-Tony

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]