On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:35:04 +0800 Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently we have many duplicates in definitions of huge_pmd_unshare. > In all architectures this function just returns 0 when > CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE is N. > > This patch put the default implementation in mm/hugetlb.c and lets > these architecture use the common code. Memory fails me. Why do some architectures (arm, arm64, x86_64) want huge_pmd_[un]share() while other architectures (ia64, tile, mips, powerpc, metag, sh, s390) do not? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>