On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:57:10AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > On 01/08/2015 09:18 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:05:39AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > >> On 12/03/2014 08:52 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > >> > It'd be useful to know where the both scanner is start. And, it also be > > >> > useful to know current range where compaction work. It will help to find > > >> > odd behaviour or problem on compaction. > > >> > > >> Overall it looks good, just two questions: > > >> 1) Why change the pfn output to hexadecimal with different printf layout and > > >> change the variable names and? Is it that better to warrant people having to > > >> potentially modify their scripts parsing the old output? > > > > > > Deciaml output has really bad readability since we manage all pages by order > > > of 2 which is well represented by hexadecimal. With hex output, we can > > > easily notice whether we move out from one pageblock to another one. > > > > OK. I don't have any strong objection, maybe Mel should comment on this as the > > author of most of the tracepoints? But if it happens, I think converting the old > > tracepoints to new hexadecimal format should be a separate patch from adding the > > new ones. > > > > To date, I'm not aware of any user-space programs that heavily depend on > the formatting. The scripts I am aware of are ad-hoc and easily modified > to adapt to format changes. LTT-NG is the only tool that might be > depending on trace point formats but I severely doubt it's interested in > this particular tracepoint. Okay. Thanks for confirmation! Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>