On 12/03/2014 08:52 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > It'd be useful to know where the both scanner is start. And, it also be > useful to know current range where compaction work. It will help to find > odd behaviour or problem on compaction. Overall it looks good, just two questions: 1) Why change the pfn output to hexadecimal with different printf layout and change the variable names and? Is it that better to warrant people having to potentially modify their scripts parsing the old output? 2) Would it be useful to also print in the mm_compaction_isolate_template based tracepoints, pfn of where the particular scanner left off a block prematurely? It doesn't always match start_pfn + nr_scanned. Thanks, Vlastimil -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>