Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:54:49 -0600 (CST)
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cl@xxxxxxxxx designates 2001:558:fe2d:44:76:96:27:211 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=cl@xxxxxxxxx; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>, Han Pingtian <hanpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, penberg@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: linux-mm-outgoing@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140128182947.GA1591@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> This helps about the same as David's patch -- but I found the reason
> why! ppc64 doesn't set CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES :) Expect a patch
> shortly for that and one other case I found.

Oww...

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: Wanpeng Li
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: David Rientjes
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: Nishanth Aravamudan
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: David Rientjes
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: Nishanth Aravamudan
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: David Rientjes
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: Nishanth Aravamudan
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: Joonsoo Kim
- Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
  - From: Nishanth Aravamudan

Prev by Date: [PATCH RESEND] mm: Optimize put_mems_allowed() usage
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]