On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Wanpeng Li wrote: > > > > > > >diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > > >index 545a170..a1c6040 100644 > > >--- a/mm/slub.c > > >+++ b/mm/slub.c > > >@@ -1700,6 +1700,9 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, > > > void *object; > > > int searchnode = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_node_id() : node; > > This needs to be numa_mem_id() and numa_mem_id would need to be > consistently used. > > > > > > >+ if (!node_present_pages(searchnode)) > > >+ searchnode = numa_mem_id(); > > Probably wont need that? > I think the problem is a memoryless node being used for kmalloc_node() so we need to decide where to enforce node_present_pages(). __slab_alloc() seems like the best candidate when !node_match(). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>