On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Wanpeng Li wrote: > > > >diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > >index 545a170..a1c6040 100644 > >--- a/mm/slub.c > >+++ b/mm/slub.c > >@@ -1700,6 +1700,9 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, > > void *object; > > int searchnode = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_node_id() : node; This needs to be numa_mem_id() and numa_mem_id would need to be consistently used. > > > >+ if (!node_present_pages(searchnode)) > >+ searchnode = numa_mem_id(); Probably wont need that? > >+ > > object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, searchnode), c, flags); > > if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE) > > return object; > > > > The bug still can't be fixed w/ this patch. Some more detail would be good. If memory is requested from a particular node then it would be best to use one that has memory. Callers also may have used numa_node_id() and that also would need to be fixed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>