Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] memblock: Introduce bottom-up allocation mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/26/2013 11:50 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:37:34PM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
>>>> +		WARN_ONCE(1, "memblock: Failed to allocate memory in bottom up "
>>>> +			"direction. Now try top down direction.\n");
>>>> +	}
>>>
>>> You and I would know what was going on and what the consequence of the
>>> failure may be but the above warning message is kinda useless to a
>>> user / admin, right?  It doesn't really say anything meaningful.
>>>
>>
>> Hmmmm.. May be something like this:
>>
>> WARN_ONCE(1, "Failed to allocated memory above the kernel in bottom-up,"
>>           "so try to allocate memory below the kernel.");
> 
> How about something like "memblock: bottom-up allocation failed,
> memory hotunplug may be affected\n".
> 

Ok, I understand what you want. Explicitly telling the user the functionality
may be invalid due to some failure. Yeah, this is really meaningful, i will
take yours, thanks.

-- 
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]