Sure!
On Aug 9, 2013 7:42 AM, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ning Qu wrote:
> I just tried, and it seems working fine now without the deadlock anymore. I
> can run some big internal test with about 40GB files in sysv shm. Just move
> the line before the locking happens in vma_adjust, something as below, the
> line number is not accurate because my patch is based on another tree right
> now.
Looks okay to me. Could you prepare real patch (description, etc.). I'll
add it to my patchset.
>
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end >
> next->vm_end);
> }
> }
>
> + vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next);
> +
> if (file) {
> mapping = file->f_mapping;
> if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR))
> @@ -597,8 +599,6 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end >
> next->vm_end);
> }
> }
>
> - vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next);
> -
> anon_vma = vma->anon_vma;
> if (!anon_vma && adjust_next)
> anon_vma = next->anon_vma;
>
>
> Best wishes,
> --
> Ning Qu (曲宁) | Software Engineer | quning@xxxxxxxxxx | +1-408-418-6066
--
Kirill A. Shutemov