Re: [PATCH 20/23] thp: handle file pages in split_huge_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Does this look good to you? I want it to stay in this thread so I didn't send it by git imap-send.


From e637cfc915107f0b7df11ec58046c1f7fae87a10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ning Qu <quning@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:54:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] thp: Fix deadlock situation in vma_adjust with huge page in
 page cache.

In vma_adjust, the current code grabs i_mmap_mutex before calling
vma_adjust_trans_huge. This used to be fine until huge page in page
cache comes in. The problem is the underlying function
split_file_huge_page will also grab the i_mmap_mutex before splitting
the huge page in page cache. Obviously this is causing deadlock
situation.

This fix is to move the vma_adjust_trans_huge before grab the lock for
file, the same as what the function is currently doing for anonymous
memory. Tested, everything works fine so far.

Signed-off-by: Ning Qu <quning@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/mmap.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 519ce78..accf1b3 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -750,6 +750,8 @@ again:                      remove_next = 1 + (end > next->vm_end);
                }
        }

+       vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next);
+
        if (file) {
                mapping = file->f_mapping;
                if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR)) {
@@ -773,8 +775,6 @@ again:                      remove_next = 1 + (end > next->vm_end);
                }
        }

-       vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next);
-
        anon_vma = vma->anon_vma;
        if (!anon_vma && adjust_next)
                anon_vma = next->anon_vma;
-- 
1.8.3


Best wishes,
-- 
Ning Qu (曲宁) | Software Engineer | quning@xxxxxxxxxx | +1-408-418-6066


On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ning Qu <quning@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sure!

On Aug 9, 2013 7:42 AM, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ning Qu wrote:
> I just tried, and it seems working fine now without the deadlock anymore. I
> can run some big internal test with about 40GB files in sysv shm. Just move
> the line before the locking happens in vma_adjust, something as below, the
> line number is not accurate because my patch is based on another tree right
> now.

Looks okay to me. Could you prepare real patch (description, etc.). I'll
add it to my patchset.

>
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ again:                      remove_next = 1 + (end >
> next->vm_end);
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next);
> +
>         if (file) {
>                 mapping = file->f_mapping;
>                 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR))
> @@ -597,8 +599,6 @@ again:                      remove_next = 1 + (end >
> next->vm_end);
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next);
> -
>         anon_vma = vma->anon_vma;
>         if (!anon_vma && adjust_next)
>                 anon_vma = next->anon_vma;
>
>
> Best wishes,
> --
> Ning Qu (曲宁) | Software Engineer | quning@xxxxxxxxxx | +1-408-418-6066

--
 Kirill A. Shutemov


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]