On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > > > schednuma figures I have available. > > > > > > > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202 > > > > I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with > > > > 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as > > Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or > 'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the > current name of our tree be possible? > Sure, no problem. > (We dropped sched/numa long ago and that you still keep > referring to it is rather confusing to me.) > Understood. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>