Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > 
> > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one
> > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest
> > schednuma figures I have available.
> > 
> 
> Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202
> 
> I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with
> 
> 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as

Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or 
'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the 
current name of our tree be possible?

(We dropped sched/numa long ago and that you still keep 
referring to it is rather confusing to me.)

Thanks!

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]