On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > schednuma figures I have available. > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202 I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as tip/sched/core from the time I last pulled patches as posted on the list patches posted since which are x86/vsyscall: Add Kconfig option to use native vsyscalls, switch to it mm/migration: Improve migrate_misplaced_page() mm, numa: Turn 4K pte NUMA faults into effective hugepage ones x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on #WP pmd fixups 2. autonuma + native THP support porte by Hugh 3. balancenuma with a missing THP migration bit for memcg If all goes according to plan it'll do a pair of runs -- one with oprofile and one without in case there are profile-related questions. Hopefully they'll be collected correctly and usable. I'm not using perf simply because I do not have the necessary automation in place. I had kept oprofile automation in place when it was important that I could run identical tests on older kernels. I did not just pull the tip tree for schednuma because it would not be a like-like comparison with the other trees. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>