On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Minchan Kim wrote: > I guess it would improve system performance very well. > But as I wrote down in description, downside of the patch is that we have to > age anon lru although we don't have swap. But gain via the patch is bigger than > loss via aging of anon lru when memory pressure happens. I don't see other downside > other than it. What do you think about it? > (I didn't implement anon lru aging in case of no-swap but it's trivial > once we decide) I am a bit confused like some of the others as to why this patch is necessary since we already have DONT_NEED. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>