On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 7:38 PM Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >I'm a bit lost with these calculations at this point. Please send the > >full patch, including the new values for KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET (do I > >understand correctly that you want to change them?). It'll be easier > >to look at the code. > > Sorry, this thread became a little bit confusing. No, I think the > KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET values are fine. I just wanted to embrace the idea of > overflow for the purpose of the check in kasan_non_canonical_hook(). > > But I'll put down my train of thought about the overflow + calculations in the > patch message. > > > > >Feel free to send this patch separately from the rest of the series, > >so that we can finalize it first. > > I have the x86 tag-based series basically ready (just need to re-read it) so I > think I can send it as whole with this patch and 3 others from this series. Sounds good!
