Hi Michal,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:19:55PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > This patch introudes MIGRATE_DISCARD mode in migration.
> > It drop clean cache pages instead of migration so that
> > migration latency could be reduced. Of course, it could
> > evict code pages but latency of big contiguous memory
> > is more important than some background application's slow down
> > in mobile embedded enviroment.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/migrate_mode.h | 11 +++++++---
> > mm/migrate.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/migrate_mode.h b/include/linux/migrate_mode.h
> > index ebf3d89..04ca19c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/migrate_mode.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/migrate_mode.h
> > @@ -6,11 +6,16 @@
> > * on most operations but not ->writepage as the potential stall time
> > * is too significant
> > * MIGRATE_SYNC will block when migrating pages
> > + * MIGRTATE_DISCARD will discard clean cache page instead of migration
> > + *
> > + * MIGRATE_ASYNC, MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT, MIGRATE_SYNC shouldn't be used
> > + * together as OR flag.
> > */
> > enum migrate_mode {
> > - MIGRATE_ASYNC,
> > - MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT,
> > - MIGRATE_SYNC,
> > + MIGRATE_ASYNC = 1 << 0,
> > + MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT = 1 << 1,
> > + MIGRATE_SYNC = 1 << 2,
> > + MIGRATE_DISCARD = 1 << 3,
> > };
>
> Since CMA is the only user of MIGRATE_DISCARD it may be worth it to
> guard it inside an #ifdef, eg:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> MIGRATE_DISCARD = 1 << 3,
> #define is_migrate_discard(mode) (((mode) & MIGRATE_DISCARD) == MIGRATE_DISCARD)
The mode bit can be used with other bits like MIGRATE_SYNC|MIGRATE_DISCARD.
So it is correct that (mode & MIGRATE_DISCARD).
Anyway, I don't want to fold it into only CMA because I think we can
have a pontential users in mm.
For example, memory-hotplug case. No enough free memory in the system
but lots of page cache page as a migration source, then we can remove
page cache page instead of migration and it might be better than failing
memory-hotremove.
In summary, I want to open it for potential usecases in future if anyone
doesn't oppose strongly.
> #endif
>
>
> > #endif /* MIGRATE_MODE_H_INCLUDED */
> > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> > index 77ed2d7..8119a59 100644
> > --- a/mm/migrate.c
> > +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> > @@ -685,9 +685,12 @@ static int __unmap_and_move(struct page *page, struct page *newpage,
> > int remap_swapcache = 1;
> > struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> > struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
> > + enum ttu_flags ttu_flags;
> > + bool discard_mode = false;
> > + bool file = false;
> >
> > if (!trylock_page(page)) {
> > - if (!force || mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
> > + if (!force || mode & MIGRATE_ASYNC)
It's not wrong technically but for readability, NP.
>
> + if (!force || (mode & MIGRATE_ASYNC))
>
> > goto out;
> >
> > /*
>
>
> --
> Best regards, _ _
> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
> ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>