On 6/5/24 15:24, Qais Yousef wrote: >>> But rt is a shortened version of realtime, and so it is making *it less* >>> clear that we also have DL here. >> Can SCHED_DL be considered a real-time scheduling class as in opposite >> to SCHED_BATCH for instance? Due to its requirements it fits for a real >> time scheduling class, right? >> And RT (as in real time) already includes SCHED_RR and SCHED_FIFO. > Yeah I think the usage of realtime to cover both makes sense. I followed your > precedence with task_is_realtime(). > > Anyway. If people really find this confusing, what would make sense is to split > them and ask users to call rt_task() and dl_task() explicitly without this > wrapper. I personally like it better with the wrapper. But happy to follow the > crowd. For me, doing dl_ things it is better to keep them separate, so I can easily search for dl_ specific checks. rt_or_dl_task(p); would also make it clear that we have both. -- Daniel
