On 6/5/24 11:32, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2024-06-04 17:57:46 [+0200], Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: >> On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote: >>> - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) || >>> + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) || >> >> I do not like bikeshedding, and no hard feelings... >> >> But rt is a shortened version of realtime, and so it is making *it less* >> clear that we also have DL here. > > Can SCHED_DL be considered a real-time scheduling class as in opposite > to SCHED_BATCH for instance? Due to its requirements it fits for a real > time scheduling class, right? > And RT (as in real time) already includes SCHED_RR and SCHED_FIFO. It is a real-time scheduler, but the problem is that FIFO and RR are in rt.c and they are called the "realtime" ones, so they are the first to come in mind. -- Daniel >> -- Daniel > > Sebastian >
