On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:45 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:33 AM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:25 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri 10-05-24 14:42:07, Barry Song wrote: > > > [...] > > > > I'm completely open to discussing both topics in the same TAO session. > > > > Having a separate session isn't important to me at all. > > > > > > If we happen to still have some topics uncovered we can schedule a > > > follow up slot. > > > > Thanks, Michal. > > > > Barry, you are very welcome to present your alternative approach in > > the same session. > > > > In fact, it seems that we both independently explored this > > pageblock-based approach. I did share our design with a few folks and > > explained why we put it on the back burner and have been focusing on > > the zone-based approach since then. > > > > Let me attach the deck that outlines our design, hopefully, we'll have > > enough time to cover some of its ideas if there is enough interest. > > Thank you. I'm also attaching our findings regarding mTHP allocation & > reclamation fallback, along with our approach and observations on running > TAO on Pixel 6. > > From deploying mTHP on numerous phones, I've learned that I'm not keen > on using dedicated page blocks for mTHP. Instead, I prefer the virtual zone > approach due to the folio size conflict in a single LRU. Further details are > available in the attached PDF. I'd like to know what page sizes were enabled for your test? A single page size, for example, 64K, or all possible page sizes? > > Best regards > Barry
