Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC]mTHP reliable allocation and reclamation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:33 AM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:25 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri 10-05-24 14:42:07, Barry Song wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I'm completely open to discussing both topics in the same TAO session.
> > > Having a separate session isn't important to me at all.
> >
> > If we happen to still have some topics uncovered we can schedule a
> > follow up slot.
>
> Thanks, Michal.
>
> Barry, you are very welcome to present your alternative approach in
> the same session.
>
> In fact, it seems that we both independently explored this
> pageblock-based approach. I did share our design with a few folks and
> explained why we put it on the back burner and have been focusing on
> the zone-based approach since then.
>
> Let me attach the deck that outlines our design, hopefully, we'll have
> enough time to cover some of its ideas if there is enough interest.

Thank you. I'm also attaching our findings regarding mTHP allocation &
reclamation fallback, along with our approach and observations on running
TAO on Pixel 6.

>From deploying mTHP on numerous phones, I've learned that I'm not keen
on using dedicated page blocks for mTHP. Instead, I prefer the virtual zone
approach due to the folio size conflict in a single LRU. Further details are
available in the attached PDF.

Best regards
Barry

Attachment: mTHP_allocation_reclamation.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux