On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 10:45 +0500, Muhammad Muzammil wrote: > should I create the v2 or this patch is fine? Personally, I don't think anyone cares about misspellings unless it obscures the meaning of the sentence, so, given the interactions in this thread, I'd argue the only one really worth fixing is relay -> relies. James > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:27 PM James Bottomley > <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > /* > > > > > - * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption > > > > > becase they never > > > > > + * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption > > > > > because they never > > > > > * update their counter from in-interrupt context. > > > > > For > > > > > these two > > > > > > > > I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say... > > > > Maybe someone else does. > > > > > > s/relay/rely/ > > > > relies, surely, being the correct third person singular form of the > > verb to match the nominative noun "the caller". > > > > James > > >
