On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > /* > > - * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption becase they never > > + * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption because they never > > * update their counter from in-interrupt context. For these two > > I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say... > Maybe someone else does. s/relay/rely/
