On 10/14/23 08:45, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> /* >>> - * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption becase they never >>> + * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption because they never >>> * update their counter from in-interrupt context. For these two >> >> I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say... >> Maybe someone else does. > > s/relay/rely/ Duh. Thanks. So either: + * The callers from rmap rely on disabled preemption because they never or + * The caller from rmap relies on disabled preemption because they never but the entire paragraph still needs some care IMO. -- ~Randy
