On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:54:08PM -0700, Vishal Moola wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:11:06AM +0900, Hyesoo Yu wrote: > > For compound pages, the head sets the PG_head flag and > > the tail sets the compound_head to indicate the head page. > > If a user allocates a compound page and frees it with a different > > order, the compound page information will not be properly > > initialized. To detect this problem, compound_page(page) and > > the order are compared, but it is not checked when the order is 0. > > That error should be checked regardless of the order. > > I believe all compound pages are order >= 1, so this error can't occur > when the order is 0. > Yes. All compound pages are order >= 1. However if the user uses the API incorrectly, the order value could be zero. For example, addr = alloc_pages(GFP_COMP, 2); free_pages(addr, 0); (struct page[16])0xFFFFFFFE21715100 = ( (flags = 0x4000000000000200, lru = (next = 0x0, prev = 0xDEAD000000000122),// Clear PG_head (flags = 0x4000000000000000, lru = (next = 0xFFFFFFFE21715101, prev = 0xFFFFFFFF00000201), // Remain compound head It is memory leak, and it also makes system stability problem. on isolation_single_pageblock, That case makes infinite loops. for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < boundary_pfn; ) { if (PageCompound(page)) { // page[1] is compound page struct page *head = compound_head(page); // page[0] unsigned long head_pfn = page_to_pfn(head); unsigned long nr_pages = compound_nr(head); // nr_pages is 1 since page[0] is not compound page. if (head_pfn + nr_pages <= boundary_pfn) { pfn = head_pfn + nr_pages; // pfn is set as page[1]. continue; } } So, I guess, we have to check the incorrect use in free_pages_prepare. Thanks, Hyesoo Yu.