Hi, all, Friendly ping again? Huacai On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 10:13 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, Eric, > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:43 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, Luis, > > > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 7:25 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 04:55:33PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > > > > Friendly ping? > > > > > > You want to cc the folks who Nacked your patch. Until then, this > > > probably can't go further. > > Thank you very much. Eric and Andrew are already in the CC list, so > > add Thomas now. > > > > My brain is a little old-fashioned so I insisted that "a thread > > without mm_struct should be a kernel thread" in the previous patch. > > Unfortunately this makes Eric and Thomas unhappy, I'm very sorry for > > that. > > > > During the discussion of the previous patch I know I made some > > mistakes about some basic concepts, but I also found the name > > "user_mode_thread()" is somewhat confusing. I think rename it to > > kmuser_thread() is better, because: > > 1, it identify init and umh as user threads; > > 2, it points out that init and umh are special user threads that run > > in kernel mode before loading a user program. > > > > Sorry for my rudeness again. > Excuse me, but could you please tell me what your opinion is. In my > opinion a typical user thread is created by > pthread_create()/sys_clone(), it is better to distinguish typical user > threads from init and umh. > > Huacai > > > > Huacai > > > > > > Luis
