Hi, Luis, On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 7:25 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 04:55:33PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > > Friendly ping? > > You want to cc the folks who Nacked your patch. Until then, this > probably can't go further. Thank you very much. Eric and Andrew are already in the CC list, so add Thomas now. My brain is a little old-fashioned so I insisted that "a thread without mm_struct should be a kernel thread" in the previous patch. Unfortunately this makes Eric and Thomas unhappy, I'm very sorry for that. During the discussion of the previous patch I know I made some mistakes about some basic concepts, but I also found the name "user_mode_thread()" is somewhat confusing. I think rename it to kmuser_thread() is better, because: 1, it identify init and umh as user threads; 2, it points out that init and umh are special user threads that run in kernel mode before loading a user program. Sorry for my rudeness again. Huacai > > Luis
