Hi, Eric, On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:43 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, Luis, > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 7:25 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 04:55:33PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > > > Friendly ping? > > > > You want to cc the folks who Nacked your patch. Until then, this > > probably can't go further. > Thank you very much. Eric and Andrew are already in the CC list, so > add Thomas now. > > My brain is a little old-fashioned so I insisted that "a thread > without mm_struct should be a kernel thread" in the previous patch. > Unfortunately this makes Eric and Thomas unhappy, I'm very sorry for > that. > > During the discussion of the previous patch I know I made some > mistakes about some basic concepts, but I also found the name > "user_mode_thread()" is somewhat confusing. I think rename it to > kmuser_thread() is better, because: > 1, it identify init and umh as user threads; > 2, it points out that init and umh are special user threads that run > in kernel mode before loading a user program. > > Sorry for my rudeness again. Excuse me, but could you please tell me what your opinion is. In my opinion a typical user thread is created by pthread_create()/sys_clone(), it is better to distinguish typical user threads from init and umh. Huacai > > Huacai > > > > Luis
