Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



July 20, 2023 at 8:27 PM, "Petr Tesařík" <petr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> 
> V Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:54:08 +0200
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> napsáno:
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:47:37AM +0000, Yajun Deng wrote:
> >  It's based on linux-next tree.
> >  
> >  This patch should be after my other patch in linux-next tree.
> >  a960925a6b23("dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures"). 
> >  
> >  Where did this land?
> > 
> 
> Well... in the linux-next tree:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-next.html
> 
> > 
> > dma patches really should be going through the DMA tree..
> > 
> 
> Indeed. The other patch was also sent to the iommu ML back in May. It's
> the thread where we were looking for Barry Song's current email address.
>

Thanks. This link shows what happened at that time:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230512094210.141540-1-yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
 
> Petr T
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux