Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:25:17 +0200
Cc
: corbet@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx, robin.murphy@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, kim.phillips@xxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20230712074758.1133272-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev
>
References
: <
20230712074758.1133272-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
It turns out this doesn't apply at all. Can you resend it against Linus' latest tree?
References
:
[PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
From:
Yajun Deng
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] RISC-V: mm: Add tests for RISC-V mm
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] selinux: use vma_is_initial_stack() and vma_is_initial_heap()
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[eCos]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
