Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
From: "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:47:37 +0000
Cc: corbet@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx, robin.murphy@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, kim.phillips@xxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230720082517.GA7057@lst.de>
References: <20230720082517.GA7057@lst.de> <20230712074758.1133272-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Tls-required: No

July 20, 2023 at 4:25 PM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> It turns out this doesn't apply at all. Can you resend it against
> Linus' latest tree?
>

It's based on linux-next tree.

This patch should be after my other patch in linux-next tree.
a960925a6b23("dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures").

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

References:
- Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
  - From: Yajun Deng

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two minor cleanups for compaction
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/13] mm: jit/text allocator
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux