On Mon, 21 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > While we're at it, can one of my patches for consistent name string handling > among caches be applied? > > Once you guys reach a decision about what is the best behavior: strdup'ing it > in all caches, or not strduping it for the slub, I can provide an updated > patch that also updates the slob accordingly. strduping is the safest approach. If slabs keep a pointer to string data around then slabs also need their private copy. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>