On 05/21/2012 05:51 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
While we're at it, can one of my patches for consistent name string handling
among caches be applied?
Once you guys reach a decision about what is the best behavior: strdup'ing it
in all caches, or not strduping it for the slub, I can provide an updated
patch that also updates the slob accordingly.
strduping is the safest approach. If slabs keep a pointer to string data
around then slabs also need their private copy.
You told me that once, but David seemed to disagree.
David, do you agree with this ?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>