* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-08 11:20:41]: > > * Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-08 10:30:08]: > > > > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest > > > > uprobes patches: > > > > > > > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS) > > > > > > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo? > > > > > > I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th. > > > > Ingo, > > > > Since you had asked me to send the patch series again > > after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. [...] > > Mind sending a delta patch instead? The patches are now > reasonably well tested and don't seem to break in any functional > way, so unless the delta patch is really ugly we should try that > instead of rebasing the branch. > Okay .. will send the delta patch now -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>